Comment 10 for bug 1004017

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:21 PM, Jamie Strandboge <email address hidden> wrote:
> I'm sorry to inform you that ubuntu-packaging-guide is being rejected
> for the following reason:
>  * the package does not provide a watch file. While this is the
> preferred method, if this is not possible, please consider adding a
> comments only watch file, a README.source file with clear instructions
> on how the source tarball was generated or use get-orig-source in
> debian/rules. This is required to verify the integrity of the source
> package.

Alright, I'll add a dummy watch file or a README.source, but this
seems like strange grounds for rejection of a native package.

On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 5:34 PM, Jamie Strandboge <email address hidden> wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-15 at 16:21 -0500, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
>  * ubuntu-packaging-guide-epub contains a hidden file:
>  /usr/share/doc/ubuntu-packaging-guide-epub/epub/.buildinfo
>  * ubuntu-packaging-guide-html contains hidden files:
>  /usr/share/doc/ubuntu-packaging-guide-html/singlehtml/.buildinfo
>  /usr/share/doc/ubuntu-packaging-guide-html/html/.buildinfo
>
>> After making these changes, feel free to reupload.

Good catch. This should already be fixed in trunk. Are you just
pointing this out, or is this considered grounds for rejection from
the NEW queue on its own? It seems like this is quoted from the output
of some kind of qa script? Is this something that could be added to
lintian, especially if it is grounds for rejection?

Thanks!

-- Andrew Starr-Bochicchio

   Ubuntu Developer <https://launchpad.net/~andrewsomething>
   Debian Maintainer
<http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=a.starr.b%40gmail.com>
   PGP/GPG Key ID: D53FDCB1