Comment 3 for bug 153358

Revision history for this message
MasterAslan (brianmichaelh) wrote : Re: [Bug 153358] Re: bcm43xx cannot suspend mac

I confirm this is the same version I get 14e4:4312

I worked with ndiswrapper in feisty but it won't work on fwcutter or
ndiswrapper in gutsy.

On 26/10/2007, Miłosz Kosobucki <email address hidden> wrote:
>
> I have the same problem. I tried both amd64 and i386 versions of gutsy
> and used bcm43xx-fwcutter (through restricted-manager) to get the
> firmware. My computer is HP notebook (dv6510ew). In fwcutter I used the
> firmware from internet link that was provided. I also tried several
> other firmwares (like this:
> http://downloads.openwrt.org/sources/wl_apsta-3.130.20.0.o from
> http://linuxwireless.org/en/users/Drivers/b43 and
> bcm43xx_compwiz18.1-all.deb firmware (got it somewhere on forum)) with
> the same result. I also tried extracting firmware from windows vista
> driver (bcmwl6.sys) but fwcutter told me that this file doesn't contain
> any firmware.
>
> I don't know what the problem may be, because the card is listed as
> compatibile with the bcm43xx driver. So maybe firmware is incorrect, if
> so restricted-manager should check it and point proper firmware to me.
>
> With these errors card is listed in iwconfig but can't find any network
> (and network is present because on windows it gets detected with about
> 80% strenght).
>
> This is lspci outpu about my card:
>
> 03:00.0 Network controller [0280]: Broadcom Corporation BCM4312 802.11a/b/g
> [14e4:4312] (rev 02)
> Subsystem: Hewlett-Packard Company Unknown device [103c:1371]
> Flags: bus master, fast devsel, latency 0, IRQ 16
> Memory at b0200000 (64-bit, non-prefetchable) [size=16K]
> Capabilities: <access denied>
>
> Dmesg output about wifi card is exactly the same as in reporter's
> attachment.
>
> ** Attachment added: "lspci-v-nn"
> http://launchpadlibrarian.net/10176806/lspci-v-nn
>
> --
> bcm43xx cannot suspend mac
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/153358
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>