Comment 8 for bug 319400

Revision history for this message
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio (andrewsomething) wrote :

@ Sebastien
> - the tarball have a COPYING, is that you who changed to COPYING.LGPL2 and COPYING.LGPL3? the
> sources states either can be used and the upstream COPYING is a LGPL one so what the COPYING
> says should be enough there

For some reason the copyright information in SVN at the time of release differs from the tarball.

@ Jelmer

As I mentioned above, evo and e-d-s 2.25.x should be in Jaunty shortly, so the debate on when to regenerate configure, ect... is basically academic.