Thanks for your contribution! I've just sponsored it into Natty. I edited the changelog to re-target the upload to natty instead of maverick, and I added the fields from the Debian Patch Tagging Guidelines (http://dep.debian.net/deps/dep3/) so we can more easily keep track of the patch. Other than that the patch looked good.
I've also submitted the patch to Debian using the submittodebian tool in ubuntu-dev-tools. This is something that you can do yourself in the future. Especially for packages where the Debian maintainers are responsive (which is especially common for packages maintained by a team) and where there aren't already Ubuntu-specific changes, submitting patches to Debian can be the fastest way to get changes in.
Also, when you have a debdiff that's ready to be uploaded, you should subscribe ubuntu-sponsors (as per https://wiki.ubuntu.com/SponsorshipProcess). That will make sure that the patch gets in front of Ubuntu sponsors so it can be handled more quickly on our side.
Thanks for your contribution! I've just sponsored it into Natty. I edited the changelog to re-target the upload to natty instead of maverick, and I added the fields from the Debian Patch Tagging Guidelines (http:// dep.debian. net/deps/ dep3/) so we can more easily keep track of the patch. Other than that the patch looked good.
I've also submitted the patch to Debian using the submittodebian tool in ubuntu-dev-tools. This is something that you can do yourself in the future. Especially for packages where the Debian maintainers are responsive (which is especially common for packages maintained by a team) and where there aren't already Ubuntu-specific changes, submitting patches to Debian can be the fastest way to get changes in.
Also, when you have a debdiff that's ready to be uploaded, you should subscribe ubuntu-sponsors (as per https:/ /wiki.ubuntu. com/Sponsorship Process). That will make sure that the patch gets in front of Ubuntu sponsors so it can be handled more quickly on our side.