Comment 19 for bug 2020769

Hi Kleber,

it's unclear to me if your request from comment #15 was done. In comment #14, we see that the lunar verification was done with "accel-config - 3.5.2": that's the version in the lunar release pocket, not lunar-proposed, as you noted.

Then in comment #16, we just have a statement that with "accel-config 4.0" the accel-config tests are skipped, and DSA passed.

The test plan doesn't mention any case of a "skipped" test, so I'm unclear whether this is a success or not. Furthermore, it's a bit unambiguous to state just "accel-config 4.0": was it with the packages from proposed? The version in lunar-proposed is "4.0-2~ubuntu0.23.04".

It all comes down again to the simple rule of following the test plan and stating clearly which packages were used, and the clear steps that were followed. Comments #16 and #17 are vague in that regard. Robie asked in comment #1:

"Report of a successful verification should state the kernel version used as well as the version of accel-config and the specific steps performed."

In addition, please clarify unambiguously if skipped tests are OK for these Lunar and Jammy LTS updates, why, and update the test plan stating where they are expected, because right now it just says "3. the script will report failures if they occur".