On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:22:47PM EST, David Henningsson wrote:
> Hmm, looking deeper at this issue, it seems that we're patching
> asoundlib.h, but asoundlib.h is dynamically generated during build (from
> asoundlib-head.h and other files), so our patched file is overwritten,
> which is why asoundlib.h ends up not having the patch.
>
> Do you think this warrants an SRU?
Possibly, as this could very well bite other, and possibly proprietary, third parties who try and build against ALSA.
On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 06:22:47PM EST, David Henningsson wrote:
> Hmm, looking deeper at this issue, it seems that we're patching
> asoundlib.h, but asoundlib.h is dynamically generated during build (from
> asoundlib-head.h and other files), so our patched file is overwritten,
> which is why asoundlib.h ends up not having the patch.
>
> Do you think this warrants an SRU?
Possibly, as this could very well bite other, and possibly proprietary, third parties who try and build against ALSA.
Luke