I specifically tested the version from Trusty: 0.10.5-1ubuntu0.14.04.1.
I tested it by enabling cachefilesd and using dd to get the disk to about 95% full.
With 0.10.5-1, starting cachefilesd with a full disk caused the process to spin at 100% cpu usage. With the version from proposed, CPU usage was down to normal negligible levels.
The other user did a similar test with the Xenial version 0.10.5-1ubuntu0.16.04.1 and had similar results: the version in -proposed does not max out a CPU core when the disk is full.
Hi,
Thanks Eric.
I specifically tested the version from Trusty: 0.10.5- 1ubuntu0. 14.04.1.
I tested it by enabling cachefilesd and using dd to get the disk to about 95% full.
With 0.10.5-1, starting cachefilesd with a full disk caused the process to spin at 100% cpu usage. With the version from proposed, CPU usage was down to normal negligible levels.
The other user did a similar test with the Xenial version 0.10.5- 1ubuntu0. 16.04.1 and had similar results: the version in -proposed does not max out a CPU core when the disk is full.
Regards,
Daniel