Ubuntu
charls package

charls 1.0-6 source package in Ubuntu

Changelog

charls (1.0-6) unstable; urgency=low


  * Really make the package multiarch capable. Closes: #768404
  * Bump Std-Vers to 3.9.6, no changes needed.

 -- Mathieu Malaterre <email address hidden>  Fri, 07 Nov 2014 09:20:43 +0100

Upload details

Uploaded by:
Debian Med
Uploaded to:
Sid
Original maintainer:
Debian Med
Architectures:
any
Section:
libs
Urgency:
Low Urgency

See full publishing history Publishing

Series Pocket Published Component Section
Xenial release universe libs

Downloads

File Size SHA-256 Checksum
charls_1.0-6.dsc 1.9 KiB fc39ac277d1a6be6ec1d7a33de47283e24c6ca1669f850475ad65bc359b05065
charls_1.0.orig.tar.gz 33.2 KiB 91bbd623735045803a2d645ebb4f65e19a2c8132653dc2d1f6be3cb87e197eca
charls_1.0-6.debian.tar.xz 5.2 KiB f94bec0b645090f759f37fa1f205e00718939a6e537fa06391ff26e5868c45f1

Available diffs

No changes file available.

Binary packages built by this source

libcharls-dev: No summary available for libcharls-dev in ubuntu yakkety.

No description available for libcharls-dev in ubuntu yakkety.

libcharls1: Implementation of the JPEG-LS standard

 CharLS is an optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard for lossless and
 near-lossless image compression
 .
 JPEG-LS (ISO-14495-1/ITU-T.87) is a standard derived from the Hewlett Packard
 LOCO algorithm. JPEG LS has low complexity (meaning fast compression) and high
 compression ratios, similar to JPEG 2000. JPEG-LS is more similar to the old
 Lossless JPEG than to JPEG 2000, but interestingly the two different techniques
 result in vastly different performance characteristics.

libcharls1-dbgsym: debug symbols for package libcharls1

 CharLS is an optimized implementation of the JPEG-LS standard for lossless and
 near-lossless image compression
 .
 JPEG-LS (ISO-14495-1/ITU-T.87) is a standard derived from the Hewlett Packard
 LOCO algorithm. JPEG LS has low complexity (meaning fast compression) and high
 compression ratios, similar to JPEG 2000. JPEG-LS is more similar to the old
 Lossless JPEG than to JPEG 2000, but interestingly the two different techniques
 result in vastly different performance characteristics.