Ubuntu
digikam package

  1. Bug #145239
  2. Comment #40

Comment 40 for bug 145239

Revision history for this message
In , Mark Purcell (msp) wrote :

Marcus has just informed me that the .la files are not necessary.

On Friday 19 January 2007 18:34, Marcus Meissner wrote:
> Err, actually the .la files not necessary as I now know. ... Sorry for the confusion.

So what is the solution?

Does digikam need to be patched to access the .so files and not the .la files, per comment #11 from Achim above??

Mark