Scott Kitterman wrote:
> For Intrepid, updating to 1.0.1 seems sensible.
Right, although some fixes are backported, but it contains many new and updated
translations.
> I'm trying to
> understand what "The result is that in the near future the emesene
> package will be completely unusable." is about. We ought to do an SRU
> for Hardy for that, whatever it is.
>
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> For Intrepid, updating to 1.0.1 seems sensible.
Right, although some fixes are backported, but it contains many new and updated
translations.
> I'm trying to
> understand what "The result is that in the near future the emesene
> package will be completely unusable." is about. We ought to do an SRU
> for Hardy for that, whatever it is.
>
That is bug 249530, already in hardy-proposed.