> inet 169.254.169.254/32 scope global eth0
Shouldn't that be using "scope link"? I don't know if that would matter for this bug, but it seems a bit odd for it to be a global scope address. Might be harmless though.
> inet 169.254.169.254/32 scope global eth0
Shouldn't that be using "scope link"? I don't know if that would matter for this bug, but it seems a bit odd for it to be a global scope address. Might be harmless though.