Comment 4 for bug 420019

Revision history for this message
Andrew Starr-Bochicchio (andrewsomething) wrote : Re: [Bug 420019] Re: New upstream version: 0.3

On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 4:28 PM, Steve Dodier<email address hidden> wrote:
> We already packaged it before FF but there were too many packages,
> according to the MOTU I talked to. I would just like to say that

I just took a quick look at the package in the PPA, and I see what
s/he meant. I certainly don't think it is a blocker, but you might
want to consider simply having an exaile-plugins package for the
Recommended plugins. We install them all by default as it is anyways.
Perhaps even putting all the Suggested plugins in an
exaile-plugins-extras package as well.

> apparently, the two debian maintainers of exaile (who I never saw in
> #exaile) considered it a good idea for 0.2.x to put all the plugins into
> the core package and to forget half of the dependencies, so that users
> would have to manually find the deps when they wanted to enable a
> plugin.

There were certainly some issues with the plugins in 0.2.x....

> For the FFE, Exaile's inclusion is a Xubuntu Karmic spec goal, so that
> should be dealable in due time. The next release of Exaile is planned
> around 20th of September, and will be a bugfix release.

I'd heard that rumor going around. I'm not involved with the Xubuntu
team, but if you need any help with filing an exception and/or a
sponsor for the upload let me know if I can be of assistance.