I have a concern about the proposed patch: if the code is ever built for an arch > 7-a (in the future) the wrong code will silently be built.
Is it not feasible to use configure tests to determine whether asm("nop") and __sync_* are supported? This is more future-proof...
I have a concern about the proposed patch: if the code is ever built for an arch > 7-a (in the future) the wrong code will silently be built.
Is it not feasible to use configure tests to determine whether asm("nop") and __sync_* are supported? This is more future-proof...