© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
(Note that I asked for further feedback on this very issue and never received it:
https:/
I also have already pointed out in detail why the proposed model for double-sided ruby is more complicated than the one in the HTML spec now:
https:/
Plus, the proposal of adding more elements means more churn and complexity in the parser, which is especially sad since this is only beneficial for the transitory period. It's a cost we have to pay forever, for a short-term benefit.)