ok sry, I won't do that in the future.I don't mean to be annoying, I just really feel some more thought should go into this bug. Do you guys understand why I think that a non-usable gcc is worse than no gcc at all?
ok sry, I won't do that in the future.I don't mean to be annoying, I just really feel some more thought should go into this bug. Do you guys understand why I think that a non-usable gcc is worse than no gcc at all?