Em Qui, 2005-11-03 =C3=A0s 14:08 -0800, Scott Anderson escreveu:
> Gustavo:
Hey,
> The bug is only revealed when Nautilus is not invoked on startup
> of Gnome. I am not sure if Nautilus is required in the Gnome
> desktop, but I had to disable it a few years back (processor
> hog) and when I updated to Gnome 2.10, I started to have all
> these problems controlling the background and panel icons
> showing up. I enabled Nautilus again, and now I don't have the
> problems anymore.
I cannot reproduce it here still. Can you still reproduce it if you
disable nautilus?
If so, would you mind to do it and send me a copy of your gconf and
gnome configuration so I can try them here? If you don't include
anything from .gnome2_private you should be on the safe side.
I'd like to be sure the bug does not exist or investigate it if it does.
--=-zCrfLEgKxw3IjQxF3cPl
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Esta =?ISO-8859-1?Q?=E9?= uma parte de mensagem
assinada digitalmente
Message-Id: <email address hidden>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2005 20:20:58 -0200
From: Gustavo Noronha Silva <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: Bug#298452: still able to reproduce?
--=-zCrfLEgKxw3 IjQxF3cPl Transfer- Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-
Em Qui, 2005-11-03 =C3=A0s 14:08 -0800, Scott Anderson escreveu:
> Gustavo:
Hey,
> The bug is only revealed when Nautilus is not invoked on startup
> of Gnome. I am not sure if Nautilus is required in the Gnome
> desktop, but I had to disable it a few years back (processor
> hog) and when I updated to Gnome 2.10, I started to have all
> these problems controlling the background and panel icons
> showing up. I enabled Nautilus again, and now I don't have the
> problems anymore.
I cannot reproduce it here still. Can you still reproduce it if you
disable nautilus?
If so, would you mind to do it and send me a copy of your gconf and
gnome configuration so I can try them here? If you don't include
anything from .gnome2_private you should be on the safe side.
I'd like to be sure the bug does not exist or investigate it if it does.
Thanks,
--=20 people. debian. org/~kov> www.debian. org> * <http:// www.debian- br.org>
<email address hidden>: Gustavo Noronha <http://
Debian: <http://
--=-zCrfLEgKxw3 IjQxF3cPl pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Description: Esta =?ISO-8859- 1?Q?=E9? = uma parte de mensagem
Content-Type: application/
Content-
assinada digitalmente
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
19pSHPyXxAQIYhh AAiKsxXZi30G7dM 8HLUPXLcCU6NQ3c m0AC WVYEbH8wnAO13eK 9Ej5PXjaOSfuFeR 4WwER1i0HV303V1 DggO I0GbArMyyk6tR+ xb73bFwAqeYSy5x brIjMdkEkqqwD03 LCVur 3puJgMWtGFZS+ ZCXYMv3EEuUYTU5 jo9lsLSYB+ 9EQYn2Qj8puHvy x/FQgrxs/ 404Yfk3O8UGK04P QgslA9/ zz0NZySOFNaF9Sp BI2 n1abhv/ 85YG4ALAz28lSiq 2y2yTdsg1T9Wop6 B9EnKdGmvWcS jxma9GNaHknqVFU v+4kelmo5IRWOli orQBs+Kr/ z0P1Pr1hZ5 4OYL0Iw5OjCU2/ 5dqmZQNFaw8en28 ocRDrMMaqPTnKeM Obeue fAcyc16kYGo+ Uh+GLNq2doYo8YC kd8Ry0N/ lbcR/PTZX0HyNm kpiPMgZX5Rd51w+ P491yTDnJKr3k3J +M7VAku2PBCntbr Mck7 yzp+HUMb0TRUe/ 7w/G6Tm8O98QerO /bAkviM5K7xwRqb jbp3v
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
iQIVAwUAQ3UZRxD
jmTh6usjgiDLKHh
yGRag5Cwk8mYSEQ
uduVcknNThC/
vWk9SjGfvIntpEh
j3Pgkqb4hBrL5Ms
8Ei40sSPKuQJfCr
WruizYnFQpJDhpc
5twVx4GjNuYMt4M
Fc6qjhGZEGTxi6d
uY2T+D91cPi78Kd
AtkLoy8ueqo=
=2htZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-zCrfLEgKxw3 IjQxF3cPl- -