Comment 7 for bug 858954

Revision history for this message
Timo Kluck (tkluck) wrote : Re: [Bug 858954] Re: [needs-packaging] goocanvas 2.0

What's the standard here? I've already renamed the binary package to
libgoocanvas-2.0{,-common,-dev}. Should the source package just be
goocanvas-2.0 ? (I'm kind of confused by the existence of a
libgoocanvas3 package which just contains version 0.15).