Comment 7 for bug 99348

Several bugs I'm on the list for have been retrospectively marked as 'Critical' after being closed as fixed. There may be a good reason for this in each case, but given that several of them had no priority set or were a lower priority and had been left unsolved for quite some time it does look suspiciously like skewing of statistics. ('we've fixed X critical bugs' or 'we fixed 97% of all critical bugs', etc., except that they weren't critical until after they were fixed)

As I said, there may be a very good reason which I've missed or it could be coincidence. I also apologise for posting this here as it may not be the most appropriate place to raise such concerns, but I have no idea of anywhere else more appropriate.