Ubuntu
idjc package

  1. Bug #66475
  2. Comment #5

Comment 5 for bug 66475

Revision history for this message
StefanPotyra (sistpoty) wrote : Re: [DEBDIFF] Dependency problem

Hi,

hm... the patch isn't invasive, but idjc (binary) has never been published to edgy or prior.
Imo -backports would be a preferable target then.
However you could also argue, that it fixes a broken source package, which would at least to some extent qualify -updates. OTOH the source isn't really broken by itself, just the dependencies reside in the wrong section.

Not quite sure about this one, but I have a slight preference for -backports. Other opinions?

Cheers,
    Stefan.