On Fri, May 18, 2007 8:48 am, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 07:14 +0000, William Grant wrote:
>> I'll handle the Ubuntification once the new version is in Debian. Thanks
>> for notifying us!
>>
>> If you're changing the name, does it really need to be in non-free?
>
> I'm *not* changing the name. Instead, I'm providing "prominent version
> qualifiers and notices of possible out-datedness". I should state this
> resolution on the Debian bug.
Thanks for clarifying that on the Debian bug. I think Don's solution
sounds like a good idea, basically so it can be kept out of non-free.
On Fri, May 18, 2007 8:48 am, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-05-17 at 07:14 +0000, William Grant wrote:
>> I'll handle the Ubuntification once the new version is in Debian. Thanks
>> for notifying us!
>>
>> If you're changing the name, does it really need to be in non-free?
>
> I'm *not* changing the name. Instead, I'm providing "prominent version
> qualifiers and notices of possible out-datedness". I should state this
> resolution on the Debian bug.
Thanks for clarifying that on the Debian bug. I think Don's solution
sounds like a good idea, basically so it can be kept out of non-free.