Comment 5 for bug 7400

Message-ID: <email address hidden>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2004 01:22:50 -0700
From: Steve Langasek <email address hidden>
To: <email address hidden>
Subject: Re: jadetex vs etex

--vk/v8fjDPiDepTtA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

severity 266630 grave
tags 265078 -sarge-ignore
merge 266630 265078
thanks

Ok, and 266630 seems to be the necessary justification for not ignoring
this bug (though it's been hidden in a control message...).

I am preparing an NMU based on the patch provided in the BTS.

--=20
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

--vk/v8fjDPiDepTtA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFBMuPWKN6ufymYLloRAtLuAKDFeh9SnBsjqOIoME1wrKxNx65CBACgv9ek
oRAnHMDKmrHBZPdqGZr9Oe0=
=cquK
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--vk/v8fjDPiDepTtA--