Faced the same "bug" today. Why average user needs googling in order to find, which packages he should install for correct mp3 support under k3b? IMO, this is a serious usability issue. I understand, that installing MP3 support by default is not acceptable due to some patents issues. However, the message mentioned above should include a names of packages, which need to be installed by user in order to get MP3 support. Even a button may be added to launch adept to proceed the installation automatically. If Gnome users have the "automatic installation of multimedia support", so Kubuntu users deserve.
P.S. In Feisty libk3b2-mp3 depends on libmad0, so it's sufficient to run the installation of libk3b2-mp3 only.
Faced the same "bug" today. Why average user needs googling in order to find, which packages he should install for correct mp3 support under k3b? IMO, this is a serious usability issue. I understand, that installing MP3 support by default is not acceptable due to some patents issues. However, the message mentioned above should include a names of packages, which need to be installed by user in order to get MP3 support. Even a button may be added to launch adept to proceed the installation automatically. If Gnome users have the "automatic installation of multimedia support", so Kubuntu users deserve.
P.S. In Feisty libk3b2-mp3 depends on libmad0, so it's sufficient to run the installation of libk3b2-mp3 only.