Comment 22 for bug 347983

Revision history for this message
Mathias Gug (mathiaz) wrote :

Could you clean up all the attached patch and branches to leave only the ones relevant to the sru?

All updates should be targeted to {intrepid,jaunty}-proposed instead of {intrepid,jaunty} since the latter are closed.

Each changelog entry should refer to this bug number so that SRU team can easily find this bug when they're reviewing the new package in the NEW queue.

The jaunty,intrepid sru changelog (and branches) should be based on the intrepid/jaunty changelog. There shouldn't be any mention of karmic in there. It should only document the changes between the existing version in intrepid/jaunty and the new one.

To make it easier for reviewing the diff, I'd suggest to attach a debdiff of the landscape-client SRU. Another solution is to branch the landscape-client package branch (at lp:ubuntu/jaunty/landscape-client and lp:ubuntu/intrepid/landscape-client) and import the new upstream tarball (using bzr merge-upstream from the bzr-builddeb plugin). Prepare and push the new branch and submit a merge proposal for the ubuntu/{jaunty,intrepid}/landscape-client branch and attach it to this bug. That way the diff can be easily seen and reviewed.