Comment 21 for bug 2029924

Revision history for this message
Dan Bungert (dbungert) wrote :

This was in the sponsors queue, so I took a look as part of today's shift.

I can confirm the behavior observed in this comment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcov/+bug/2029924/comments/15

There is a reference to a get_version.sh that is not present in this (or any) binary package.

The noble build of this package does not have this problem, some magic in the perl package build system appears to be updating this to provide an answer:
$ lcov --version
lcov: LCOV version 2.0-1
This was in the sponsors queue, so I took a look as part of today's shift.

I can confirm the behavior observed in this comment: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/lcov/+bug/2029924/comments/15

There is a reference to a get_version.sh that is not present in this (or any) binary package.
The noble build of this package does not have this problem, some magic in the perl package build system appears to be updating this to provide an answer:

$ lcov --version
lcov: LCOV version 2.0-1

I think a little more work is needed on this. Note that there are additional fixes in Ubuntu Noble for this package, some of that appears necessary.

Removing sponsors for the moment, please re-subscribe sponsors when you'd like someone to look.