> They can easily be ported to libavresample.
With FFmpeg we can have both libswresample and libavresample. Asking everyone to use libavresample is a waste of resource and there is no gain at all.
> This would break a lot of software, produce more work for ubuntu developers, and would cause less software to build.
Can you name a software that only builds with Libav? It's the switching to Libav that breaks enough out-of-repository software.
> They can easily be ported to libavresample.
With FFmpeg we can have both libswresample and libavresample.
Asking everyone to use libavresample is a waste of resource and there is no gain at all.
> This would break a lot of software, produce more work for ubuntu developers, and would cause less software to build.
Can you name a software that only builds with Libav?
It's the switching to Libav that breaks enough out-of-repository software.