Comment 63 for bug 190744

Revision history for this message
Xiyue Deng (manphiz) wrote : Re: [Bug 190744] Re: Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81

Daniel Holbach <email address hidden> writes:

> daniel@bert:~$ LC_ALL=C sudo apt-get install -f
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Correcting dependencies... Done
> The following packages were automatically installed and are no longer required:
> libgdamm-3.0-dev libgdamm-3.0-8
> Use 'apt-get autoremove' to remove them.
> The following extra packages will be installed:
> libgdamm3.0-dev
> Suggested packages:
> libgdamm-3.0-doc
> The following NEW packages will be installed:
> libgdamm3.0-dev
> 0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 0 not upgraded.
> 4 not fully installed or removed.
> Need to get 0B/91.8kB of archives.
> After this operation, 1040kB of additional disk space will be used.
> Do you want to continue [Y/n]?
> (Reading database ... 163824 files and directories currently installed.)
> Unpacking libgdamm3.0-dev (from .../libgdamm3.0-dev_2.9.82-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb) ...
> dpkg: error processing /var/cache/apt/archives/libgdamm3.0-dev_2.9.82-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb (--unpack):
> trying to overwrite
> `/usr/include/libgdamm-3.0/libgdamm/private/blob_p.h', which is also
> in package libgdamm-3.0-dev

This is caused by not having proper Conflicts/Replaces field for
libgdamm3.0-dev in debian/control. I've done this in Debian. Should
be fixed when my package is uploaded and Ubuntu syncs.

> dpkg-deb: subprocess paste killed by signal (Broken pipe)
> Errors were encountered while processing:
> /var/cache/apt/archives/libgdamm3.0-dev_2.9.82-0ubuntu1_amd64.deb
> E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)
> daniel@bert:~$
>
>
> ** Changed in: libgdamm3.0 (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided => High
> Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
>
> --
> Request: Upgrade libgdamm3.0 to upstream version 2.9.81
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/190744
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.