(In reply to comment #21)
> Sad.
>
I don't feel happy about it, but I lack the expertise in the write/read area.
> My conclusion is that the present labels position calculation requires custom
> pages.
The present label wizard uses 'custom pages', i.e. the page size (width and heigth) is saved with the label definition. This is the case for version 3.5.3 (or 3.5.4) and later.
Your conclusion is correct and the requirement is met.
(In reply to comment #21)
> Sad.
>
I don't feel happy about it, but I lack the expertise in the write/read area.
> My conclusion is that the present labels position calculation requires custom
> pages.
The present label wizard uses 'custom pages', i.e. the page size (width and heigth) is saved with the label definition. This is the case for version 3.5.3 (or 3.5.4) and later.
Your conclusion is correct and the requirement is met.