Comment 4 for bug 119659

Revision history for this message
Radu Cristian Fotescu (beranger) wrote : Re: [Bug 119659] Re: libata inconsistency through kernel updates

I am trying to get a life (I am getting older and I don't want to switch
distros like a mad man just because they're buggier than all the other
operating systems), and I am pissed off by the inability of the (K)Ubuntu
team to understand what QA is -- because only Mandriva is buggier than
(K)Ubuntu!

> I don't even have hardware affected by this.

I do have. Having
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/util-linux/+bug/66637, i.e. the
swap's UUID permanently changing, I *had* to add the swap in fstab as
/dev/sdb3, then as /dev/hdb3, then as /dev/sdb3, then as /dev/hdb3, etc.

Then, my CD-RW permanently changes from /dev/hdd to /dev/sdb, then back to
/dev/hdd, then again /dev/sdb, etc.

HOW IS IT SO HARD TO UNDERSTAND THAT DURING THE LIFETIME OF A POINT RELEASE
(7.04), THE F--ING DEVICE NAMES SHOULD NOT F--ING CHANGE TWICE A WEEK,
DEPENDING ON THE LATEST KERNEL UPDATE?

> If you really want to keep the old naming scheme you can
> always create udev rules to do the renaming for you...

Or I can fucking stop using this f-- buggy and unstable and undermanaged
distro!

> Eventually I suspect most things will settle on libata (I believe it's
> Alan Cox/Jeff Garzik's decision and reasons for the move are given on
> http://lwn.net/Articles/198344/ ) but while some unknown subset of
> people are reporting issues with the libata drivers and some other set
> with similar hardware are reporting issue with the IDE drivers you are
> going to struggle to move people all at once or know who to move and who
> not to move.

If Ubuntu and Fedora have adopted buggy kernels, it is their decision, and
they have to assume it, not to switch back and forth all the time!

No, this is not project management.

      Ask a question on any topic and get answers from real people. Go to Yahoo! Answers and share what you know at http://ca.answers.yahoo.com