Ubuntu
linux package

  1. Bug #1833281
  2. Comment #82

Comment 82 for bug 1833281

Revision history for this message
In , m.novosyolov (m.novosyolov-linux-kernel-bugs) wrote :

(In reply to ValdikSS from comment #58)
> I have an idea why this bug is much worse with BTRFS than with EXT4: BTRFS
> has much bigger read/write amplification, up to 10x higher than EXT4.

You mean that when e.g. Chromium browser writes its cache, it loads IO "up to 10x higher than EXT4", and, when IO is also loaded by swapping, it causes microfreezes? Are you sure that operations that cause write amplifications are not done in background?