Ubuntu
linux package

  1. Bug #1959532
  2. Comment #4

Comment 4 for bug 1959532

Revision history for this message
bugproxy (bugproxy) wrote : Comment bridged from LTC Bugzilla

------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2022-03-04 11:03 EDT-------
(In reply to comment #8)
> Hi Niklas, well, for this specific patch 4cdf2f4e24ff a clean cherry-pick is
> possible.
> But if other (rather independent ones) are needed on top, I'll wait ...

Sorry for the late reply. Even though this(In reply to comment #8)
> Hi Niklas, well, for this specific patch 4cdf2f4e24ff a clean cherry-pick is
> possible.
> But if other (rather independent ones) are needed on top, I'll wait ...

Sorry for the late reply. The commits needed for this feature all landed
in v5.16-rc1 and are:

1c8174fdc798489159a79466fca782daa231219a ("s390/pci: tolerate inconsistent handle in recover")
6526a597a2e856df9ae94512f9903caccd5196d6 ("s390/pci: add simpler s390dbf traces for events ")
4fe204977096e900cb91a3298b05c794ac24f540 ("s390/pci: refresh function handle in iomap")
da995d538d3a17610d89fea0f5813cf7921b3c2c ("s390/pci: implement reset_slot for hotplug slot")
dfd5bb23ad75bdabde89ac3166705a450bf16acb ("PCI: Export pci_dev_lock()")
4cdf2f4e24ff0d345fc36ef6d6aec059333a261e ("s390/pci: implement minimal PCI error recovery")

The first one isn't a strict dependency but a trivial bug fix to a commit in v5.15 in the same area.
I must have missed tagging that for stable. If you prefer I can also create a separate BZ for it.