Comment 5 for bug 794698

Revision history for this message
Luke J Militello (kilahurtz) wrote :

Not sure if this is related or if I am doing something wrong, but this looks like it is also present in Lucid. I built a custom kernel to add PPS support. The first version went well, however re-building with newer (or older) source from the Git repos yields '/proc/version_signature' to lie.

My first build was with 2.6.32-33.66; version sig is correct, was also running native 2.6.32-33.66 at the time.
The next was with 2.6.32-33.72; version sig still says 2.6.32-33.66, running 2.6.32-33.66 w/PPS patch at the time.
Last test was with 2.6.32-28.55; version sig still says 2.6.32-33.66, running 2.6.32-33.72 w/PPS patch at the time.

Tried on two systems...any one have any ideas why this is happening? The kernels work fine otherwise. Thanks.