This looks promising; this is the first time I've seen a self-contained
patch that would fix ltrace for ppc64el without a new upstream release.
Does IBM believe this patch fixes
<https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ltrace/+bug/1367308>, or are
there still other patches required for ltrace to be fully functional?
Hi Thierry,
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 02:02:16PM -0000, bugproxy wrote:
> ------- Comment (attachment only) From <email address hidden> 2016-03-09 08:39 EDT-------
> ** Attachment added: "patch to fix ltrace ps,ls and make check" /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 1547152/ +attachment/ 4593785/ +files/ ltrace- LP1547152. diff
> https:/
This looks promising; this is the first time I've seen a self-contained /bugs.launchpad .net/ubuntu/ +source/ ltrace/ +bug/1367308>, or are
patch that would fix ltrace for ppc64el without a new upstream release.
Does IBM believe this patch fixes
<https:/
there still other patches required for ltrace to be fully functional?