Comment 5 for bug 1547152

------- Comment From <email address hidden> 2016-03-03 11:18 EDT-------
With current procps 3.11 I get a clean output for ltrace ps ending with:
readproc(0x1000d321b10, 0x10030788, 0, 2261) = 0x10030788
__snprintf_chk(0x3fff8d2b0090, 240, 1, -1) = 5
strlen("20693") = 5
fwrite("20693", 5, 1, 0x3fff8d7917b8) = 1
dev_to_tty(0x3fff8d2b0090, 240, 0x8802, 0x50d5) = 5
strlen("pts/2") = 5
fwrite(" pts/2", 6, 1, 0x3fff8d7917b8) = 1
__snprintf_chk(0x3fff8d2b0090, 240, 1, -1) = 8
strlen("00:00:00") = 8
fwrite(" 00:00:00", 12, 1, 0x3fff8d7917b8) = 1
escape_command(0x3fff8d2b0090, 0x10030788, 0x20000, 0x3fffe167ff44) = 6
strlen("ltrace") = 6
fwrite(" ltrace\n0", 8, 1, 0x3fff8d7917b820693 pts/2 00:00:00 ltrace
) = 1
readproc(0x1000d321b10, 0x10030788, 0, 0x72746c20) = 0x10030788
__snprintf_chk(0x3fff8d2b0090, 240, 1, -1) = 5
strlen("20694") = 5
fwrite("20694", 5, 1, 0x3fff8d7917b8) = 1
dev_to_tty(0x3fff8d2b0090, 240, 0x8802, 0x50d6) = 5
strlen("pts/2") = 5
fwrite(" pts/2", 6, 1, 0x3fff8d7917b8) = 1
__snprintf_chk(0x3fff8d2b0090, 240, 1, -1) = 8
strlen("00:00:00") = 8
fwrite(" 00:00:00", 12, 1, 0x3fff8d7917b8) = 1
escape_command(0x3fff8d2b0090, 0x10030788, 0x20000, 0x3fffe167ff44) = 2
strlen("ps") = 2
fwrite(" ps\n00:00", 4, 1, 0x3fff8d7917b820694 pts/2 00:00:00 ps
) = 1
readproc(0x1000d321b10, 0x10030788, 0, 0xa737020) = 0
closeproc(0x1000d321b10, 0x10030788, 0x8000, 1) = 0x3fff8d790cd8
__fpending(0x3fff8d7917b8, 0, 1, 0) = 0
ferror(0x3fff8d7917b8) = 0
fclose(0x3fff8d7917b8) = 0
__fpending(0x3fff8d7916d8, 0, 0, 0) = 0
ferror(0x3fff8d7916d8) = 0
fclose(0x3fff8d7916d8) = 0
+++ exited (status 0) +++

and the behaviour of ltrace ls changed as it is not any more looping but taking a sigsegv

Agree this is not satisfactory