Comment 66 for bug 146859

Revision history for this message
gnufede (gnu.fede) wrote : Re: [Bug 146859] Re: No dri (and therefore no compiz) for virtual screen greater than 2048x2048

Hello,

I'm also interested in this bug, but I just wanted to point out that
you still can use compiz with your dual screen configuration if you
'put' one above the other instead of beside. I know it's a little
messy to work with, but at least it works:

 SubSection "Display"
  Virtual 1920 1978
 EndSubSection

On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 2:25 AM, lunomad <email address hidden> wrote:
> C Snover --
>
> Thanks.  I was following Bug#146298 but not Bug#359392.  Somehow I
> missed the rollback on the 4096 patch.
>
> I just want to throw in my data points on intel G45 (Asus P5Q-EM)
> hardware, dual monitors 1920x1200 & 1024x768
>
> 1. Intrepid with home-built mesa including the 4096 patch:  stable for
> several months, EXA acceleration, compiz ok.  glxgears 500-600.
>
> 2. Stock Jaunty + EXA.  I've tried a couple of configurations with EXA
> and every time I get a "can't pin front buffer" error.
>
> 3. Stock Jaunty + UXA + NoDRI.  Stable, but no compiz.
>
> 4.  Stock Jaunty + UXA + Ludovico Cavedon's ppa https://edge.launchpad.net/~cavedon/+archive/ppa
> Frequent and unpredictable lock-ups on X, otherwise great performance.
>
> 5. xorg-edgers ppa enabled + rebuilt DRI with MAX_TEXTURES=4096 patch.
> Similar performance to #4.  Awesome glxgears 1200+ but unpredictable lockups on X.
>
>
> It's hard not to be frustrated when this was working so well on Intrepid, but hopefully it can be resolved soon. If I can do any testing, please let me know.
>
> I only really like compiz for the grid plugin and the screenshot plugin.
> If these were available in metacity I'd be perfectly happy!
>
> --
> No dri (and therefore no compiz) for virtual screen greater than 2048x2048
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/146859
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>