> different users might have different expectation about the modification date there
Actually, when you read this thread carefully, you will notice that all users writing here have the same expectation as the bug filer. The only one who has a different expectation here is you.
> anyway discussing the settings is not constructive and will not make the bug fixed faster quite the contrary so I'll stop this discussion there
Sorry, I don't get it. First you keep telling us that this is a feature, not a bug, and now you are telling us that you have no time discussing with us because you need it to fix "the bug"? Sorry to say that, but that's quite illogical. No offence intended of course.
> did you read the previous comment?
Yes, and I answered to it. Please read.
> different users might have different expectation about the modification date there
Actually, when you read this thread carefully, you will notice that all users writing here have the same expectation as the bug filer. The only one who has a different expectation here is you.
> anyway discussing the settings is not constructive and will not make the bug fixed faster quite the contrary so I'll stop this discussion there
Sorry, I don't get it. First you keep telling us that this is a feature, not a bug, and now you are telling us that you have no time discussing with us because you need it to fix "the bug"? Sorry to say that, but that's quite illogical. No offence intended of course.