Comment 6 for bug 1598759
Revision history for this message
| dino99 (9d9) wrote Re: incomplete apparmor definition for ntpd | #6 |
© 2004
Canonical Ltd.
•
Terms of use
•
Data privacy
•
Contact Launchpad Support
•
Blog
•
Careers
•
System status
•
0e1f616
(Get the code!)
@Joshua
i've just commented about my own initial #1 comment above and the related 'DENIED' logged.
That report is not mine anyway, and the subject is way more wider (as i understand it); and probably needs to check 'possible' "incomplete apparmor definition" as reported.
The OP seems to point some 'dbus' header
Maybe that was a transitional problem on his side; but he has not commented back.