<micahg> can we just do 20110426+1+really0.2.x instead of an epoch? that way if we manage to consolidate in the future, it's easier to reconcile <slangasek> micahg: I suppose so
<micahg> can we just do 20110426+ 1+really0. 2.x instead of an epoch? that way if we manage to consolidate in the future, it's easier to reconcile
<slangasek> micahg: I suppose so