Comment 56 for bug 267141

On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 08:09 +0000, Martin Pitt wrote:
> I read the thread, and I like James' latest patch
> (http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18377887/pm-utils_1.1.2.4-1ubuntu6.diff)
> a lot, too. I'm going to sponsor it now, thanks to all for working on
> this!

I've mentioned this before, but I'd like to reiterate that with the
above patch, pm-utils will not be able to use suspend at all when
uswsusp is chosen instead of kernel, using the example which has been
dropped in /etc/pm/config.d. Could something be done about this? Perhaps
re-enable s2ram in uswsusp, since it isn't going to be the default
anyway? Or perhaps mix and match the patches (remove the autodetection
code and default to kernel, but patch pm/module.d/uswsusp to fall back
on kernel for check_suspend and do_suspend)?

--
Chow Loong Jin