Ubuntu
pm-utils package

  1. Bug #898564
  2. Comment #2

Comment 2 for bug 898564

Revision history for this message
Colin Ian King (colin-king) wrote :

Steve, agreed, it's a minor overhead - I just wanted to ensure that the HAL left over cruft was being flagged up as redundant and causing some extra overhead. Just wanted to save a bunch more fork/exec calls (e.g. on boot and AC/battery actions) and a few more bytes of space on the disk. I just like to see old cruft being removed if possible.

Colin