On 20 November 2010 07:54, Steve Beattie <email address hidden> wrote:
> Oh, I should point out that the CVE_2010_3867.dpatch you provided
> contained a reference to a dir_canonical_dst() function, which bothe
> generated a new compilation warning due to the arguments not matched the
> expected types and that I was unable to find defined in the source. I
> assumed it was the result of an overzealous search and replace on
> dir_canonical_path() and compensated accordingly.
>
> --
> Backport proftpd security fixes
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/674798
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
Good spot.
On 20 November 2010 07:54, Steve Beattie <email address hidden> wrote: 3867.dpatch you provided path() and compensated accordingly. /bugs.launchpad .net/bugs/ 674798
> Oh, I should point out that the CVE_2010_
> contained a reference to a dir_canonical_dst() function, which bothe
> generated a new compilation warning due to the arguments not matched the
> expected types and that I was unable to find defined in the source. I
> assumed it was the result of an overzealous search and replace on
> dir_canonical_
>
> --
> Backport proftpd security fixes
> https:/
> You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
> of the bug.
>
--
Neil Wilson