The debdiff looks good and I agree with the backports. I have also verified that the package builds fine with the proposed changes + openssl 3.
I just have some small requests before I proceed with the upload:
1) Could you add a period at the end of each changelog entry? I like to treat them as sentences, and as such I consider that they should be properly terminated.
2) Both patches should also have the "Bug-Ubuntu" DEP-3 header in order to help determining why they're needed.
3) When I'm backporting multiple patches for a logical change like this, I like writing a changelog entry like this:
* Fix FTBFS with OpenSSL 3. (LP: #1951952)
- d/p/add-SNI-support.patch: Add SNI support.
- d/p/do-not-force-tls-v1.patch: Do not enforce TLS v1.0 usage.
I think it looks more organized and is easier to understand that the patches are part of something bigger.
If you could address these points, I can proceed with the upload right away.
Thanks for working on this, Athos.
The debdiff looks good and I agree with the backports. I have also verified that the package builds fine with the proposed changes + openssl 3.
I just have some small requests before I proceed with the upload:
1) Could you add a period at the end of each changelog entry? I like to treat them as sentences, and as such I consider that they should be properly terminated.
2) Both patches should also have the "Bug-Ubuntu" DEP-3 header in order to help determining why they're needed.
3) When I'm backporting multiple patches for a logical change like this, I like writing a changelog entry like this:
* Fix FTBFS with OpenSSL 3. (LP: #1951952) SNI-support. patch: Add SNI support. not-force- tls-v1. patch: Do not enforce TLS v1.0 usage.
- d/p/add-
- d/p/do-
I think it looks more organized and is easier to understand that the patches are part of something bigger.
If you could address these points, I can proceed with the upload right away.
Thanks again.