Comment 31 for bug 923685

Revision history for this message
Steve Langasek (vorlon) wrote :

>> It looks as if you can omit step 3 in your algorithm.
> indeed, 3) won't match either 4) or 5) and so will be caught by 6) giving the same result

Except in the case that there are inet dhcp entries in /e/n/i that are *not* marked auto. Thinking about whether this should actually be handled differently.