Comment 1 for bug 1990571

Review package for ruby-ethon

[Summary]
MIR team ACK once the MIRs dependencies are solved. Keep in mind that you need to subscribe the server team before promotion. Note that we need first the dependencies to be MIR acked first:
- ruby-ffi MIR bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-ffi/+bug/1990570
- ruby-mime-types MIR bug: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ruby-mime-types/+bug/1990569

[Duplication]
There is no other package in main providing the same functionality.

[Dependencies]
OK:
- no other Dependencies to MIR due to this
  - ruby-ethon checked with `check-mir`
- no -dev/-debug/-doc packages that need exclusion
- No dependencies in main that are only superficially tested requiring
  more tests now.

[Embedded sources and static linking]
OK:
- no embedded source present
- no static linking
- does not have unexpected Built-Using entries
- not a go package, no extra constraints to consider in that regard
- not a rust package, no extra constraints to consider in that regard
- Does not include vendored code

[Security]
OK:
- history of CVEs does not look concerning.
- does not run a daemon as root
- does not use webkit1,2
- does not use lib*v8 directly
- does not parse data formats (files [images, video, audio,
  xml, json, asn.1], network packets, structures, ...) from
  an untrusted source.
- does not open a port/socket
- does not process arbitrary web content (only binding to libcurl, which is doing the parsing work)
- does not use centralized online accounts
- does not integrate arbitrary javascript into the desktop
- does not deal with system authentication (eg, pam), etc)
- does not deal with security attestation (secure boot, tpm, signatures)
- does not deal with cryptography (en-/decryption, certificates, signing, ...)

[Common blockers]
OK:
- does not FTBFS currently
- does have a test suite that runs at build time
- autokpgtests are running and passing (those are apparently autogenerated)
- test suite fails will fail the build upon error.
- no new python2 dependency

[Packaging red flags]
OK:
- Ubuntu does not carry a delta
- symbols tracking not applicable for this kind of code.
- d/watch is present and looks ok
- Upstream update history is good
- Latest release is packaged.
- Debian/Ubuntu update history is good
- promoting this does not seem to cause issues for MOTUs that so far
- no massive Lintian warnings
- d/rules is rather clean
- It is not on the lto-disabled list

[Upstream red flags]
OK:
- no Warning/Errors during the build
- no incautious use of malloc/sprintf (as far as we can check it)
- no use of sudo, gksu, pkexec, or LD_LIBRARY_PATH (usage is OK inside
  tests)
- no use of user nobody
- no use of setuid
- no important open bugs (crashers, etc) in Debian or Ubuntu
- no dependency on webkit, qtwebkit, seed or libgoa-*
- not part of the UI for extra checks
- no translation present, but none needed for this case