Comment 10 for bug 2046994

Sorry, I don't have a focal machine set up anymore to test this with. It's a little more than just a focal machine and samba, you need elasticsearch and fscrawler to digest some information in order to confirm. When I first saw that it was fixed upstream, I tested the patch on focal (patched and rebuilt the latest ubuntu package samba-4.15.13+dfsg with the patch) and it worked fine. Then I upgraded that machine to jammy in order to confirm that (a) it wasn't in the jammy package and (b) that the fix worked for jammy as well, but that means I don't have a focal machine to test with.

So, my feeling is that it was tested in focal and it's pretty benign, so it'd be safe to just assume it's good, but I know that may be riskier than you want. Personally, as long as it makes it into jammy I'm happy :D