Your issue is about bad performance of Samba in general compared to a Windows client. If you want to track that, please open a new bug and post your interesting benchmarking results there, so that we can rule out the hardy/RTL81xx/CIFS usual suspects and make sure the discussion isn't polluted by those. Btw, do you get bad performance using smbclient ? using kernel-based CIFS mounts ? Any regression from when SMBFS was used instead of CIFS ?
iinomine: /bugzilla. samba.org/ show_bug. cgi?id= 4889
I think there are several separate issues here. Niclas original issue is a RTL81xx/Samba specific issue, duplicate of bug 46081, also mentionned here:
https:/
Your issue is about bad performance of Samba in general compared to a Windows client. If you want to track that, please open a new bug and post your interesting benchmarking results there, so that we can rule out the hardy/RTL81xx/CIFS usual suspects and make sure the discussion isn't polluted by those. Btw, do you get bad performance using smbclient ? using kernel-based CIFS mounts ? Any regression from when SMBFS was used instead of CIFS ?