Comment 11 for bug 1266066

Revision history for this message
Matthias Klose (doko) wrote : Re: [Bug 1266066] Re: [MIR] strongSwan

Am 01.04.2014 02:50, schrieb Jonathan Davies:
>> The packaging does have extensive lintian errors, 137 instances of
>> unstripped-binary-or-object and one spelling-error-in-description.
>
> Packages are not stripped to enable the
> http://wiki.strongswan.org/projects/strongswan/wiki/IntegrityTest suite.

what is this supposed to check? the only reason that I can think of is file
corruption on the disk. why should strongswan be special here? you should be
able to protect against misconfigurations using dependencies. Of course this
won't help when you misconfigure strongswan itself, but why would you want to do
that?