Comment 22 for bug 413994

Revision history for this message
Julien Lavergne (gilir) wrote :

Yes, and in meantime, it was fixed on sylpheed.
However, I think the package is still not correct. Or the zemberek support is enable (with all the potential risk) and the package need adjustments (depends on zemberek and/or split into a new binary), or the support need to be disable to follow the the package. For the 2 cases, something is missing.