Em 14-03-2013 18:42, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) escreveu:
> However, the code is well tested and really can't cause any regression
> (since it adds something wasn't possible to do before).
Of course it adds a new feature, something that wasn't possible to do
before (that's why it needs a FFE). Anyway, this doesn't mean this new
feature don't have bugs (or, as in bug #1053470, another unity FFE,
privacy concerns).
I don't understand which benefits this new feature brings that overcome
the risk of introducing new bugs, with this 2000+ lines patch, and
justify a FFE?
Em 14-03-2013 18:42, Marco Trevisan (Treviño) escreveu:
> However, the code is well tested and really can't cause any regression
> (since it adds something wasn't possible to do before).
Of course it adds a new feature, something that wasn't possible to do
before (that's why it needs a FFE). Anyway, this doesn't mean this new
feature don't have bugs (or, as in bug #1053470, another unity FFE,
privacy concerns).
I don't understand which benefits this new feature brings that overcome
the risk of introducing new bugs, with this 2000+ lines patch, and
justify a FFE?