Comment 10 for bug 1991030

Hm. It's difficult to tell, because the test case script doesn't include the *expected* output, but is this the correct output? Both the second last and the last steps output
"""
Expanded Security Maintenance for Applications is enabled.
"""
even though esm-infra has been disabled before the final step. I presume esm-infra isn't the same as esm-apps, but it's not clear to me what the final step of the test script is trying to test. Presumably disabling esm-infra is expected to change the output, though?