* Forest Bond <email address hidden>, [2007-07-24 18:06 -0000]:
> I don't think that COMMAND should be commented by default. I think it
> should be set to sensible-browser by default.
>
> More importantly, I still haven't heard a reason _not_ to use sensible-
> browser instead of www-browser as the default for COMMAND. I believe
> using sensible-browser not only solves my issue, but also addresses
> those issues raised at http://bugs.debian.org/212789.
Sounds reasonable. I'll upload to Debian sid a new revision of urlview
which uses sensible browser rather than {x-,}www-browser in
url_handler.sh, without changing the default global config file.
* Forest Bond <email address hidden>, [2007-07-24 18:06 -0000]: bugs.debian. org/212789.
> I don't think that COMMAND should be commented by default. I think it
> should be set to sensible-browser by default.
>
> More importantly, I still haven't heard a reason _not_ to use sensible-
> browser instead of www-browser as the default for COMMAND. I believe
> using sensible-browser not only solves my issue, but also addresses
> those issues raised at http://
Sounds reasonable. I'll upload to Debian sid a new revision of urlview
which uses sensible browser rather than {x-,}www-browser in
url_handler.sh, without changing the default global config file.
Thanks for your suggestions.
ciao,
ema